[MD] Social Imposition ?

David M davidint at blueyonder.co.uk
Tue Dec 19 12:14:37 PST 2006


Platt

However, is not SQ preserved via collective inheritances?

David M


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <pholden at davtv.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 12:15 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] Social Imposition ?


> Quoting ARLO J BENSINGER JR <ajb102 at psu.edu>:
>
>> DNA was not "created by" inorganic atoms. Cells are not "created by" 
>> smaller
>> biological patterns. They emerge as the result of collective activity of 
>> those
>> individual patterns. Or I could say "cells originate out of the 
>> collective
>> activity of smaller biological patterns, themselves having originated out 
>> of
>> the collective activity of still smaller patterns, on down the line."
>
> As I pointed out before in quoting Pirsig, things don't originate out of
> "collective activity." That's the SOM scientific explanation. In the MOQ,
> things originate as a result of Dynamic activity and/or Dynamic invention. 
> You
> will not find Pirsig citing the "collective" as a catalyst anywhere in the 
> MOQ.
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 





More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list