[MD] The Edge 2006 Annual Question

[David M]

that's fine, describe rather than conclude

DM


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Roberts" <jse885 at localnet.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 1:00 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] The Edge 2006 Annual Question


> David M,
>
> DM said:
> Would you agree that it is fair to conclude
> that patterns or things interact with each other
> and that whenever this interaction involves one
> pattern or thing changing another that change is
> always placed on some kind of value scale for the
> pattern or thing or body changed. So change and
> consciousness and value are inseparable? We
> perceive what changes us....
>
> Scott:
> ...and as we change so does that which is perceived.
>
> My only quibble here would be with the word 'conclude'. It's more (for me) 
> a
> case that the old world view stopped making sense, revelation (mystics)
> speaks of the sort of thing you say here, and so this kind of statement
> becomes a starting point for a world that does make sense in ways the old
> one didn't (and without losing the ways the old one makes sense).
>
> - Scott
>
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>