[MD] Is Morality innate in the cosmos?

[Heather Perella]

Hey Ham,
      The way you discussed the last comment dealing
with science, finite intellect, and your philosophy
was very informative about yourself, the world, or
whichever (Thu Feb 9 10:58:38 PST 2006).  I also do
not believe in a strict non-feeling science is the one
and only key to this universe, because at times I feel
the cold in winter.  When I took a philosophy of
science course in the university Kuhn came up because
philosophers today stick with logical positivism to
understand scientific inquiry only because it seems to
be the best paradigm.  Yet, a lot of anomalies are
accumulating in the field of philosophy of science,
and there is a lot of thinking going on to redefine
how scientists do science.  The old quantum physics
experiment about the observer influencing the
experiment and social ideas creeping into the
machine/experiment is bringing up a lot of questions
as to how, as I said, scientists are really doing
science.  With all of these anomalies creeping into
awareness more and more to the point we can no longer
push them aside and must fit them into our world view,
any thesis, I would think, (especially ones that claim
universality) would help explain not just how science
is done, but how life is done by all humankind, birds,
cougars, etc...  I am off from work today, and will be
able to make some more headway into your thesis.  

SA

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com