[MD] Is Morality innate in the cosmos?

[Heather Perella]

Ham, here is a second question.

Are you saying that the difference between Darwins
revision which hardened the laws of Nature in the
scientific community into a deterministic world, is
different from essentialism because essentialism
states that the essence of things react and act with
each other, seen on an intellectual level, in such a
way that the boundary of intellect stops at a certain
view of the world?  In other words, intellect stops
and views the world in such and such a way, meanwhile
the essence of things is "deeper" than that and the
"what" of things is out of reach of intellectual
explanation?  Thus, a world exists beyond intellect
and any deterministic world view we may have, such as
a hardened view of the laws of Nature, are just a view
of the world from only the intellectual point of view?

You said:  "We have contact only with the boundaries
or surfaces of things, never with being itself."  By
this do you mean the boundaries or surfaces of things
are where intellect stops or picks up or in other
words senses/experiences/knows?  This is the realm of
intellect just as the eyes see things, but the nose
smells things?  "Never with being itself"? - explain.

SA   

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com