[MD] The Edge 2006 Annual Question

[Heather Perella]

Scott,

     I know you explained earlier what triadic means,
but please explain again, because as I noticed David
tried to interject a meaning into whatever we are
trying to gain meaning of, which I am still not seeing
what we are trying to understand in this subject
heading, and you (Scott) said, "Trouble with this (as
Peirce argues)  is that you can't make a triadic
relation out of dyadic ones. So what you are espousing
here is dualism:  first there were interacting
patterns, then (somehow) language was added."

  Is this third relation (in the triadic) an effort to
pull the discussion out of what I would call a messy
dualistic, back and forth, perspective of the world?

Thanks 
SA

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com