[MD] Barbarian attack

[Joseph Bromley]

Dear all.


>      As Marsha said, I don't know what TLS means.
The Lila Squad, I was meaning those that have studied MOQ the longest.
Question to TLS, are there defined levels that TLS as a whole agree on?
Ant I have not got around to reading your doctorate, that is my next 
assignment after I have finished reading Lila's child.
  This whole Muslim v. West is
>just the contrast of understanding that has no
>understanding that could lead to what Platt has called
>a clash of civilization.  People are fighting with
>blindness to what end?
Different areas of the globe have different moralities and cultures which is 
a good thing. It allows for the principle of resistance, friction generates 
energy, energy results in growth. As soon as a culture comes to dominate, as 
was the case with Greece after the defeat of the Persian empire, there was 
no necessity for unity between the city states, which ended up devouring 
themselves. Thus a one world morality is undesirable in my humble opinion. 
It could be argued that global capitalism will one day bring unity to the 
world, but capitalism depends on greed and lust which Pirsig places on the 
biological level, "the law of the jungle", as such the end of wars is 
unlikely under capitalism. Capitalism thrives of the more, more, more 
attitude, it is never satiated.
I have come across the idea that America went to war out of revenge for 
9/11, there was no intellectual reason. Oil played a part, that would be a 
sensible reason from an oil flued nation. The belief that democracy is the 
only method of government played a part. Love of democracy can be a love of 
a static social pattern of value. We have it therefore it must be right 
attitude. What the USA and Poodle Blair failed to come to grips with is long 
term strategy. As I already mentioned democracy comes from a movement within 
the people, not by some external power which always leads to trouble, it is 
value tyrany. It is the women in Iraq who are pushing for democracy, they 
have most to gain from it, it is their resentment of their current way of 
life which makes them the biggest voices for democracy within Iraq. Can a 
nation change its morality over night? Does not the destruction of a peoples 
social patterns result in chaos? In the majority of cases around the world 
in times of social chaos, you end up with a Noble bastard in charge. French 
revolution gave rise to Napoleon, British civil war gave rise to Cromwell, 
Cuba gave rise to Castro, Russian revolution gave rise to Stalin. When you 
descend into the law of the jungle the biggest beast comes to the fore. Call 
it an innate morality of the cosmos.

Platt you never answered the question of why you call 9/11 biological 
terrorism, it is not that simple. The terrorists use Social level concepts 
in order to get the suicide bombers to blow themselves up. Suicide is not a 
biological, they believe that they will go to heaven for there actions, this 
makes it social terrorism. The puppet masters hope to create enough moral 
pessure against the enemy that the enemy gives in. They can not fight on the 
biological level alone because they do not have the force, to take on 
America head on. Why not just leave it at terrorism?

Some of you may have noticed that this posting does not have the potency 
that my other postings have. I find it hard to get to the peak of my power 
during when connecting openly with others. It seems to be like osmosis, when 
you connect openly with people power equals itself out, the lower 
concentrations fill up the the mpre concentrate sense a weakening in their 
potency.

I will post on morality under a new thread.

Regards Joseph Bromley.

_________________________________________________________________
Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters! 
http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters