[MD] The Edge 2006 Annual Question

[Heather Perella]

Scott,

     You said:  "Meaning is also a triadic relation:
something means something else to someone."  Is this
triadic because:  (1)something, (2)something else, (3)
someone?  Giving is a Triadic relation, thus, the Car
hitting Tree Newtonian Physics understanding needs
surpassed in our understanding.  I wonder what else
Einstein was getting to, as well as, Bohr, and Stephen
Hawkings who talks about imagination being not just
used but seen by physics.  Fenyman talked about
particles being anything and everything between known
states, thus, when the known states of a particle such
as its' velocity is pushed aside to know its'
position, the velocity of the particle is potentially
all velocities.  Fenyman a very well respected physics
who worked on developing the Atom Bomb talked about
particles being in states that make them everything
and anything.  I didn't mean to talk about physics so
much, well, I did mean to, but what I am saying is the
action/reaction world of Newton is being left behind
in pursuit of a more precise understanding of the
universe.  Why understand the universe in a more
precise way?  I think this goes back to Ancient Greece
and the 'Water is Everything' type concept.  To
understand and bring rational thought into society is
to have a more rational society, one with meaning
would be beautiful Japan, and this combination, this
Beautiful mix with Intellect would calm the fears of
humankind or build another Atom Bomb.  We must be
precise and beautiful, yet, also aware and alert.

     I may have a hard time understanding what your
saying, but I am trying.  I want to keep up with this
subject throughout the year, and do not want to fall
behind or miss something as the year goes for this is
"The Edge 2006 Annual Question".

SA

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com