[MD] Is Morality innate in the cosmos?

[David M]

>
> If you can imagine Essence as an egg of 'infinite potentiality', you will
> perhaps see that the only way for this egg to create (an other) is to 
> split
> into finite pieces.  But the "splitting" does not
> destroy the integrity of the infinite egg because the "cracks" are spaces
> filled by nothingness; that is, from the egg's perspective they don't 
> exist.
> They are "illusionary", and they actualize an illusionary mode or system
> (existence) that is an "other" to the egg.
>


Ham

That's not all bad. Look let's begin with the unlimited. Being unlimited
it possesses infinite possibility as you say. To isolate something finite
out of this requires a crack, a separation, a pulling apart. This is a
polarity as Scott is trying to tell you. Hence the source of what is
is Nothingness as I have been telling you and you seem to accept
without realising that it's coming is original within the void or ovoid
if you prefer eggs. In fact difference is probably better here than
Nothingness. But what does this difference do to the unlimited
No-thingness of the void. It splits off the vast possible, but only
by Nothing so in fact a dialectic between the poles is played out
as patterns move from pole to pole, which is what we call
creation and destruction/death. There is no illusion at either pole,
but as Scott indicates this is what creates the very possibility of
existence appearing before itself as a fraction of its possibilities.

DM