[MD] Morality. Pin the tail on an invisible donkey.

[Joseph Bromley]

The message I am trying to get at is all of our so called rights and wrongs 
need looking at and weighing up intellectually. To go along with "common" 
concepts of right and wrong simply because other hold them to be true, is 
not intellectual quality.



>[joseph]
>I can not help but see quality, in good and evil, in good and bad, in
>right
>and wrong. If quality is the source of all how can it be otherwise?
>
>You may have quality in a plot to rob a bank or a museum, and execute it
>perfectly ( a la Thomas Crown Affair) but the fact that the outcome
>results in a loss to someone or society that quality is negated.
>So can we say that there is good quality and bad quality.
>
>What's the right terminology, that a cheap pair of shoes are of inferior
>quality ( is that an oxymoron) or that the lack quality?

Why buy a poor quality pair of shoes if you can afford good quality ones. It 
all depends on the context.

_________________________________________________________________
Are you using the latest version of MSN Messenger? Download MSN Messenger 
7.5 today! http://messenger.msn.co.uk