[MD] Ham & swiss cheese

[Dan Glover]

Hello everyone

>From: MarshaV <marshalz at charter.net>
>Reply-To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>Subject: [MD] Ham & swiss cheese
>Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 05:56:41 -0500
>
>
>Greetings all,
>
>I've been reading Lila's Child and I'm stunned to realize that this
>group did actually once discuss the MOQ.  The last time I read ZMM's
>Introduction of the Twenty-fifth Anniversary Edition, I was stopped
>by the sentence, "Let me also recommend www.moq.org on the Internet,
>a group that is among those few that understand it." << What's happened?>>

Hi Marsha!

Yes it's true...we once discussed the MOQ here. Thank you for taking the 
time to read Lila's Child. It was a different time and a labor of love.

>
>Ham is entitled to is Essence understanding, but I find his
>discussion incomprehensible (holy, like swiss cheese) as it relates
>to this website.  It is not directed to a better understanding of
>RMP's MOQ.  I've understood the MOQ to have a Zen
>underpinning.  Having read Nagarjuna's MKK, I accept via intuition,
>experience and now intellect the emptiness of 'conventional truth'
>and the emptiness of emptiness.  But 'conventional truth' is our
>playground, and I see the MOQ as offering a better worldview for that
>playground.

"I prostrate to Gautama
Who through compassion
Taught the true doctrine
Which leads to the relinquishing of all views."

>
>I'm not interested in Ham's Essense or Sam's Theism or Scott's
>whatever.  I would like to learn more about how the MOQ would address
>the problems confronting the world today.  Can this list get back to
>becoming a group who understand it?

I suppose that there will always be problems in the world. That's what 
drives evolution. If there were no problems, how would anything get better?

Thanks again,

Dan