[MD] Morality. Pin the tail on an invisible donkey.

[Heather Perella]

I like this discussion.  It has been helpful in
focusing the discussion upon morality and quality.

     khaled said something has Quality or it does not
have Quality.
     Joseph said something has Quality, thus, right
and wrong have Quality, but what kind of intellectual
Quality does it have?

     Is this correct so far you two?

     Could this also be put together as such? 
Something has Quality, even if right or wrong, but if
we find it to be intellectually valueless, then does
not its' Quality disappear and therefore it is no
longer present.  Since the issue (or something to use
the same word I have been using) no longer is present,
therefore, it is not either right or wrong, therefore
the dualistic notion cannot apply to it anymore,
therefore it would not have Quality.  Now, who is in
charge of judging the Quality of something, in other
words, who says it is right or wrong?  The
intellectual does according to the ranking of
decisions Quality is amidst.  Is this also the same as
the Philosopher King I have heard about?  Let's keep
discussing this.

SA

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com