[MD] Morality. Pin the tail on an invisible donkey.

[khaled Alkotob]

That's why my question earlier. Is it an oxymoron to say that something
has bad quality and the correct grammar should be that it lacks quality.

So then only Good Quality exists and there is no such thing as Bad
Quality.

Khaled




\On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 11:55:30 -0800 (PST) Heather Perella
<spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com> writes:
> I like this discussion.  It has been helpful in
> focusing the discussion upon morality and quality.
> 
>      khaled said something has Quality or it does not
> have Quality.
>      Joseph said something has Quality, thus, right
> and wrong have Quality, but what kind of intellectual
> Quality does it have?
> 
>      Is this correct so far you two?
> 
>      Could this also be put together as such? 
> Something has Quality, even if right or wrong, but if
> we find it to be intellectually valueless, then does
> not its' Quality disappear and therefore it is no
> longer present.  Since the issue (or something to use
> the same word I have been using) no longer is present,
> therefore, it is not either right or wrong, therefore
> the dualistic notion cannot apply to it anymore,
> therefore it would not have Quality.  Now, who is in
> charge of judging the Quality of something, in other
> words, who says it is right or wrong?  The
> intellectual does according to the ranking of
> decisions Quality is amidst.  Is this also the same as
> the Philosopher King I have heard about?  Let's keep
> discussing this.
> 
> SA
>