[MD] The Edge 2006 Annual Question

[Michael Hamilton]

And another follow-up,

Intellectual (4th-level) acceptance of the MOQ, is the realisation
that SOM does NOT work for everyone, everywhere, for all time. It is
an acceptance that the SQ/DQ metaphysics CAN work for everyone,
everywhere, for all time. As the DQ component cannot be defined,
intellectual acceptance of the MOQ is an acceptance that the
metaphysics which can work for everyone, everywhere, for all time,
CANNOT be intellectually defined. Therefore, intellectual acceptance
of the MOQ paves the way for moving beyond intellect (beyond the 4th
level) because it is an acceptance that reality cannot be
intellectually defined.

Making any sense?

Regards,
Mike

On 1/7/06, Michael Hamilton <thethemichael at gmail.com> wrote:
> Just a little follow-up,
>
> The wide sense in which I used "objectivity" in the last couple of
> posts seems like a synonym for "truth", so perhaps to keep the
> usefulness of the word "objective" I should go back to using it in the
> mere Cartesian sense of "objects", which the 4th level CAN move
> beyond, as opposed to the wide sense of "true for everyone,
> everywhere, for all time", which the 4th level can NOT move beyond.
> However, keeping in mind the wider sense will help greatly in
> understanding what Bo is banging on about.
>
> David, you wrote:
>
> > I think the MOQ works very nicely. But I doubt
> > everyone agrees.
>
> Their loss!
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>