[MD] A Place for the Principled Person
Arlo J. Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Sat Jul 8 14:55:01 PDT 2006
[The Plattman speaketh to Gene]
Glad to know you are a person of honor. And I respect you for being forthright
by directly answering, not ducking, my question.
[The Jarloker]
One final point for another inane, but tenacious Wurlitzer. Haven't seen them
for a while, and now Boom-Boom-Boom, they're a'flyin'.
[Plattman]
Neither do I except as provided by law. I do, however, choose to deal with
hornorable rather than deceitful people.
[The Jarloker]
It's not a question of "honor", unless you think that "monogamy" entails a
sacrifice. And, its hardly "honorable" if one is monogamous only because
haugthy, self-righteous Victorians demand public shame and humilation for
anyone violating their Superior Moral Code.
I, for example, don't consider my monogamy "honorable". I give it because I
choose to give it, not out of some notion of self-sacrifice or fear of
Victorian public scorn and shame. I'm sorry you must not feel the same way.
And Gene speaks with wisdom. I don't care about your, or anyone else's personal
decisions. What you choose to do in your relationships is between those
involved. Unlike the haughty, morally self-righteous crowd, I base my dealings
with people on.... my dealings with people.
"Was it her love or THEIR hatred?" It's easy to see hatred when you make it so
transparent, Platt.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list