[MD] Platt's Individual Level
david buchanan
dmbuchanan at hotmail.com
Tue Jul 11 13:40:28 PDT 2006
Dan quoted:
"Man is always the 'measure of all things...'"
Dan commented:
Man measures with intellect, with ideas. Always.
Steve replied:
I think 'measure' in this quote ammounts to 'experience' in the MOQ which
says that experience comes in several varieties of which intellect is only
one kind.
dmb says:
Hmmm. I think you guys are misreading the quote. It seems that you're
reading it as if it said, "Men are the measurers of all objects" but I think
the meaning is something more like, "Humanity is the standard by which
reality is judged" or even "Reality is the imaginative creation of Man". You
know what I mean? I think it says we're it and this is it. There is no
Other.
Dan commented on the quote about dropping bombs on Japan:
I think what Phaedrus possibly failed to grasp during his time in India is
that though the nature of the world is illusory, that nature doesn't negate
cause and condition. I think Phaedrus gave up on account of the fact he
failed at the time to grasp that there is no separation between subject and
object...he believed objects were things in themselves rather than
intellectual patterns of value, a very difficult point to grasp. So perhaps
it was just easier to give up and go home than it was to expand his
consciousness to the point of that of his Indian professor.
dmb says:
The guidebook explains this scene. The authors say that Phaedrus asked his
question from a conventional point of view but the Indian professor answered
the queston from a Dynamic point of view, which was confusing and
inappropriate. From an ordinary point of view, that answer was not wise. It
was shear, heartless nihilism. And as I read the scene, Pirsig is expressing
a pretty important criticism. I think he fled out of disgust and moral
outrage at such a seemingly nihilistic comment. And maybe the West can offer
something to the East on this sort issue. I mean, I think realizations about
the illusory nature of reality are not supposed to be construed so as to
negate the prohibitions against the mass murder of civilians or other war
crimes. The MOQ, I think, would help prevent the sort of confusion that
comes from asking on one level and answering on the other. And I think
that's a very good thing because such confusion can lead to moral nightmares
such as shrugging off atomic horror.
And the last time a Hydrogen bomb was tested, it was 3,800 times more
powerful than the one dropped on Hiroshima.
I gotta get me one of them.
dmb
_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar get it now!
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list