[MD] Probability

[Case]

[Platt}
I'm sure you're familiar with perjury.

[Case]
Yes, and it has nothing to do with Absolute Truth.

[Platt]
> Science is a method for testing ideas and validating observation against
> theory. It does not recognize or seek after Absolute Truth.

[Platt]
That's absolutely true. You've made my point, again..

[Case]
What point? As far as I can tell you have failed made no attempt to make
one.

[Platt]
I'll take your word for it. But I'm not sure it's an absolute truth  
like many truths of the history, such as your birth. 

[Case]
Again you show no understanding of the problem. If you will read my original
post in this thread you will see that absolute certainty does not exist
anywhere but in the NOW instant. It can not exist in the present and it can
not exist in the past.  

[Platt
Gödel gave us an absolute truth about logical systems being unable to 
prove their own validity. A good example of what I've been talking 
about.

[Case]
And what is that? 

> [Platt]
I have answered what you've been saying, point by point. I'm sorry you 
don't like the answers. It seems what you consider to be true is an  
absolute in your mind and will tolerate no other viewpoints. Finally, 
agreement among three (you, Gene, Arlo) or three million doesn't 
establish truth.  

[Case]
You have outlined no position whatsoever. You seem to think there is a
paradox or some sort here although you have not said exactly what it is.
What the three of us did was not necessarily agree but show that we
understood what the problem is. You have not.