[MD] Emergent Consciousness

[ian glendinning]

Platt said
"To each his own"

I'm profoundly disappointed Platt if that's your best pitch for Ayn
Rand's main message. You're not taking this seriously.

You are Mr Inconsistent Platt - arguing for absolute truths in one
thread, and each to his own in another. I'm trying to find the
excliuded middle here.

Ian



On 7/16/06, Platt Holden <pholden at davtv.com> wrote:
> OK, Ian. You gave if fair shot. Rand is not for everybody. But then,
> neither is Pirsig. I think, however, when you look at the sales of
> Rand's books compared to other modern philosophers, you have to admit
> her appeal is rather broad. Of course, that doesn't mean she's right
> any more than the Beatles' popularity means they produce good music.
> It comes down to "To each his own" which is my rallying cry for
> individuality.
>
> Regards,
> Platt
>
>
>
> > Sorry Platt, probably no can do.
> > You'll need to sell it to me ... the point that is.
> >
> > Supending disbelief for 250 pages now, is OK, but not for 1000 pages.
> >
> > It's dreadfully schoolboy's own stuff, with lousy engineering, lousy
> > metallurgy, lousy physics, lousy politics, OK business, OK morality
> > (triumph of the will, stuff), and even a little supense (though the plot
> > is littered with easy hooks) but the sex takes the biscuit. Heroine (so
> > far) in "a man's world" written by a woman, and every scene describes
> > what she's wearing with added choice lines like "the soft material of
> > her pristine white blouse was pressed against her breast by the wind
> > from the locomotion" and variations on that theme. Will she, won't she,
> > will they, won't they. Gimme a break from Mills & Boon.
> >
> > Tell me why I'm reading it.
> > The question is "what is depravity". And her answer is ... ?
> > Put me out of my misery. I'm fine with a spoiler or two; cut to the
> > chase.
> >
> > You are the one with the solidified cast patterns. I have plenty to
> > lose. Many productive hours of my time to add dynamic value. Although
> > they listen to music (single composer, occasionally) I don't see Rand's
> > characters wasting such valuable time reading 1000 word tomes. Like me
> > they "just do it" (so far).
> >
> > Surprise me.
> > Ian
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/15/06, Platt Holden <pholden at davtv.com> wrote:
> > > Ian:
> > >
> > > Read on, McDuff. You have nothing to lose but some static ideas. :-)
> > >
> > > Platt
> > >
> > > > Platt, earlier in this thread, before you and I eventually got to
> > > > "first-base" on emergence from interactions (aka Quality), you threw
> > > > in here "You should read Atlas Shrugged"
> > > >
> > > > Having previously read some of Rand's non-fictional philosophical
> > > > work, I've not been impressed with her apparent stereotypical
> > > > "objectivisim" - that won't surprise you - in fact I've blogged
> > > > about it in previous years and "moved on".
> > > >
> > > > Anyway given your repeated plea, I have actually obtained and
> > > > started to read Atlas Shrugged. Given that I'm about 180 pages
> > > > through my 1000 page edition, I need to know why I'm reading it ?
> > > >
> > > > The curiosity keeping me going so far is "why did Platt recommend
> > > > it, what message did Platt think I would take away from it." I'd be
> > > > interested to know.
> > > >
> > > > There are plenty of characters, central and incidental, that say a
> > > > wide range of philosophical (and political) things about business
> > > > and motivation. Some of it convincing, some of it claptrap (some of
> > > > deliberately so, some of it maybe unintended no doubt). The point
> > > > is, given that I'm sticking my neck out at this point less than 20%
> > > > of the way through, I can see all the set-ups that are going to get
> > > > resolved or turned on their heads as we go along. Suspending
> > > > disbelief for a moment, that Rand is a "clever" novelist I could be
> > > > interested in how some of those turn out, despite the fact that
> > > > there are a lot of fictional elements I find hard to swallow - as an
> > > > engineer with (real) interests from metallurgy to business operation
> > > > and management.
> > > >
> > > > But I have the sneaking suspicion the characters whose opinions I
> > > > find credible are the ones you (and Rand) will conclude are speaking
> > > > claptrap. Where does this story actually take us as far as morals
> > > > and purpose, capitalism and social engineering are concerned. Platt
> > > > ?
> > > >
> > > > Ian
> > > > PS - What makes me really nervous is that all the "glowing credits"
> > > > to "Rand's genius" on the back and inside covers are all from the
> > > > "The Ayn Rand Institute", not from any credible independent sources.
> > > > I must be some kinda mug ?
> > >
> > > moq_discuss mailing list
> > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > > Archives:
> > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> > >
> > moq_discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
>
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>