[MD] Distinguishing Levels (Individual level)

[Platt Holden]

Hey SA,

>      Platt said:  "Note the past tense: "It was . . ."
> Now that cells have discovered sex, long before we
> came on the scene, what do you suppose will be their
> next move in response to DQ? I say cells are long past
> perceiving or adjusting to DQ. Been there, done that.
> Along with evolutionary morality, the DQ response
> mechanism has moved on up to individual human beings."
> 
>      Your simply wrong here, unless, yes, there's an
> unless involved here.  First though, what we find in
> the fossil record, you know all those former
> biological creatures that have apparently evolved
> biologically, and reflectively we notice that dynamic
> quality was waiting in the wake zone for these
> creatures to change.  Here's the unless part, unless
> evolution has stopped and no more new forms of
> creatures will appear on this earth from now on.  
>      If your focused specifically on the involvement
> of sex and DQ, well, I don't know if sex will become
> something else, but as I've pointed out, on the
> biological level changes do occur, thus, what was
> static biologically, changed and new static
> definitions on the biological level have happened. 
> The dynamic quality of what will be? or what is? is
> still a valid question.

Unless you are thinking of mutating bacteria whose mutations go nowhere 
there's no evidence that the biological level is still evolving. Same 
goes for the inorganic level unless you believe the laws of physics 
will change. IMO biological evolution now depends on man's experiments 
with animal breeding and manipulation of DNA.

Incidentally, what's the "wake zone?"

Thanks

Platt