[MD] Distinguishing Levels
Heather Perella
spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com
Mon Jun 5 16:13:50 PDT 2006
Platt,
Platt said: "Sounds like scientific support for
Pirsig's thesis of a universal moral order wouldn't
you say?"
Platt, I am assuming you support a universal
moral order. Yet, you say cells and quantum particles
do not know the version of Dq definition going around
that states DQ is an inclination towards what is
better. That is a moral choice. No matter what on
any level, according to your UNIVERSAL moral order,
everything inclines towards what is better, meaning
not towards what is worse. I define Dq is "something
or nothing' undefinable. I define Sq as "something"
definable. What is moral for everything on a
universal moral order that has to include everything
since it is universal that you, Platt, advocate?
Thanks,
SA
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list