[MD] Distinguishing Levels

[Platt Holden]

SA:

>      Platt, I am assuming you support a universal
> moral order.  Yet, you say cells and quantum particles
> do not know the version of Dq definition going around
> that states DQ is an inclination towards what is
> better.  That is a moral choice.

Yes, at one time cells and quantum particles responded to DQ towards 
betterness, resulting in evolution up to the social level. I see no 
evidence that they are playing any part in evolution now.

> No matter what on
> any level, according to your UNIVERSAL moral order,
> everything inclines towards what is better, meaning
> not towards what is worse.  I define Dq is "something
> or nothing' undefinable.  I define Sq as "something"
> definable.  What is moral for everything on a
> universal moral order that has to include everything
> since it is universal that you, Platt, advocate?

The inorganic and biological levels are now static moral levels as part 
of the universal moral order. They respond to the present moment 
(Quality) instinctively and predictably. Their responses are thus 
static moral patterns. That's why the hard sciences have been so 
successful.  The social and intellectual levels are still evolving, led 
by individuals at the intellectual level responding to DQ. That's why 
the soft sciences (economics, social studies, history) have been so 
contentious.  

Hope this answers your question.

Thanks.
Platt