[MD] Platt's Individual Level

Platt Holden pholden at davtv.com
Sat Jun 24 04:15:25 PDT 2006


[Gene]
>If you were to take Our idea, that
> ideas are not inseperable from individuals, you would have the
> metaphysical tools to back down fromt his argument.

If "our idea" is that ideas cannot be separated from individuals, I 
agree.

> You're too attached to this idea, and reufse to listen to reason, logic
> or differing viewpoints. And the reason you're attached to this idea, is
> because of this very idea! That's why it is a low Quality idea. Because
> it is a static pattern so strong it has completely blocked you off from
> Dynamic Intellectual Quality.

And you are not attached to your idea? 

> A few critics as in every single other person in this discussion group?
> I know. You can't drop the idea because nobody else likes it, because
> you're an individual! So you're idea must be much better than the idea
> that more than one person shares.
> 
> Can't you see how this idea has completely trapped you?
> 
> You're stuck in static patterns, unable to get to new ideas. It's
> terrible.
 
When everybody has the same idea and unable to get new ideas, that's 
not static? 

Platt




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list