[MD] Platt's Individual Level
Platt Holden
pholden at davtv.com
Sat Jun 24 04:15:25 PDT 2006
[Gene]
>If you were to take Our idea, that
> ideas are not inseperable from individuals, you would have the
> metaphysical tools to back down fromt his argument.
If "our idea" is that ideas cannot be separated from individuals, I
agree.
> You're too attached to this idea, and reufse to listen to reason, logic
> or differing viewpoints. And the reason you're attached to this idea, is
> because of this very idea! That's why it is a low Quality idea. Because
> it is a static pattern so strong it has completely blocked you off from
> Dynamic Intellectual Quality.
And you are not attached to your idea?
> A few critics as in every single other person in this discussion group?
> I know. You can't drop the idea because nobody else likes it, because
> you're an individual! So you're idea must be much better than the idea
> that more than one person shares.
>
> Can't you see how this idea has completely trapped you?
>
> You're stuck in static patterns, unable to get to new ideas. It's
> terrible.
When everybody has the same idea and unable to get new ideas, that's
not static?
Platt
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list