[MD] Platt's Individual Level

[Platt Holden]

> "Not inseperable" as in seperable. As in the exact opposite of the idea
> you are pushing. So no, you do not agree.

You say ideas can be separated from individuals. Prove it.
 
> Make no mistake, I'm fairly attached to my ideas. But I am also willing
> to drop that idea if given a better one. I am capable of letting ideas
> go if they prove unworkable.

I have yet to see that demonstrated.

> I wonder how you answer the charge that
> this One idea you have has almost completely blocked you off from DQ?
> never mind, I'm pretty sure I'd know how you'd answer. Just do me this
> one favour and really think about that, don't just decide it's wrong and
> move on with your idea. Step back, think about the idea, think about how
> it pins you down. I doubt you will, and I doubt it'll do anything if you
> do. But it's worth a shot.

I've thought about it and have decided that in no way, shape or form 
does my idea block me from DQ.  Rather, sticking to what everybody else 
thinks on this site is blocking you from DQ.

>> When everybody has the same idea and unable to get new ideas, that's
>> not static?
 
> You're putting two ideas together that have no real correlation.
> Everybody having the same idea, and no one getting new ideas are two
> seperate events that are linked only occasionally.

Linked more often than not.

> If everybody agreed
> with Your idea, and I assure you that the vast majority of the public
> does, then yes, it does block them from new ideas. For all your
> individual talk, you're idea is Straight out of the SOM mythos. It has
> almost no relation whatsoever to the MOQ.

You are blocked from new ideas about the MOQ. 

> I dunno why I even bother with logic, you'll probably just sidestep the
> whole thing.

I have yet to see a smidgen of logic, much less an argument from you 
about why my ideas aren't good. So far nothing buy unsupported 
accusations.
 
> This idea of yours is a wall. This ideas has you so wrapped up in it,
> that it has completely stopped the ability of new ideas to supplant it.
> Oh sure! Maybe in other ways intellectual DQ can reach you, but I assume
> you're as close minded about the correctness of the rest of your ideas
> too.

So far you've exhibited exactly what you accuse me of.

> If you can't listen to reasonm you can't listen to logic, you can't make
> proper arguments, you can't adapt to new situations, then you have lost
> the DQ that once drove your thoughts. You're stuck in a rut, unable to
> move forward or back, Static Quality is what you have.

Same to you.

Platt