[MD] Platt's Individual Level

[Gene M]

On 6/24/06, Platt Holden <pholden at davtv.com> wrote:
>
> > "Not inseperable" as in seperable. As in the exact opposite of the idea
> > you are pushing. So no, you do not agree.
>
> You say ideas can be separated from individuals. Prove it.
>
> > Make no mistake, I'm fairly attached to my ideas. But I am also willing
> > to drop that idea if given a better one. I am capable of letting ideas
> > go if they prove unworkable.
>
> I have yet to see that demonstrated.
>
> > I wonder how you answer the charge that
> > this One idea you have has almost completely blocked you off from DQ?
> > never mind, I'm pretty sure I'd know how you'd answer. Just do me this
> > one favour and really think about that, don't just decide it's wrong and
> > move on with your idea. Step back, think about the idea, think about how
> > it pins you down. I doubt you will, and I doubt it'll do anything if you
> > do. But it's worth a shot.
>
> I've thought about it and have decided that in no way, shape or form
> does my idea block me from DQ.  Rather, sticking to what everybody else
> thinks on this site is blocking you from DQ.
>
> >> When everybody has the same idea and unable to get new ideas, that's
> >> not static?
>
> > You're putting two ideas together that have no real correlation.
> > Everybody having the same idea, and no one getting new ideas are two
> > seperate events that are linked only occasionally.
>
> Linked more often than not.
>
> > If everybody agreed
> > with Your idea, and I assure you that the vast majority of the public
> > does, then yes, it does block them from new ideas. For all your
> > individual talk, you're idea is Straight out of the SOM mythos. It has
> > almost no relation whatsoever to the MOQ.
>
> You are blocked from new ideas about the MOQ.
>
> > I dunno why I even bother with logic, you'll probably just sidestep the
> > whole thing.
>
> I have yet to see a smidgen of logic, much less an argument from you
> about why my ideas aren't good. So far nothing buy unsupported
> accusations.
>
> > This idea of yours is a wall. This ideas has you so wrapped up in it,
> > that it has completely stopped the ability of new ideas to supplant it.
> > Oh sure! Maybe in other ways intellectual DQ can reach you, but I assume
> > you're as close minded about the correctness of the rest of your ideas
> > too.
>
> So far you've exhibited exactly what you accuse me of.
>
> > If you can't listen to reasonm you can't listen to logic, you can't make
> > proper arguments, you can't adapt to new situations, then you have lost
> > the DQ that once drove your thoughts. You're stuck in a rut, unable to
> > move forward or back, Static Quality is what you have.
>
> Same to you.
>
> Platt


Well, never mind then.

-Gene