[MD] The differentiating nothingness
Heather Perella
spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com
Sat Mar 11 08:50:30 PST 2006
Ham and Peter,
Ham said: "...by simply removing nothingness you
would theoretically eliminate being and have Essence."
Yep! I get it. The freedom to do so (that is
remove nothingness), that choice. Here I notice the
undefined slipping through the cracks providing an
eternity of discussion by us or maybe 14 billion years
of discussion to show how that black cherry was
(carved out), but what of Essence before 14 billion
years of existence - so much here. This undefined
quality, that's what I see dynamically slipping into
static being.
Yeah, if you want I think I'm ready to move onto
Value.
Peter, remember Ham, (maybe Reiner), and I
talking about all this physical stuff existing and
being 'carved out' by nothingness. Nothingness is an
actual 'thing' in our discussion, is that right Ham?
It comes about by choice, choice made by Essence
itself negating, thus separating itself using
nothingness to do so. With these separations being
done by choice by Essence using nothingness,
individuals come about. This is the stuff of quality.
Ham I don't want to diverge too much, but this is
how I see it. As to Peter's statement, I don't know
if that locks us up from discussing Value. I am ready
if you are though, Ham.
SA
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list