[MD] Experience, essentialism, physicalism
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Mon Mar 13 09:04:36 PST 2006
Matt, All,
I'm just jumping in here, just to make a point I feel worth making about
"language as a tool".
Matt, I think you are correct in your assessment that language is not
something that can get us closer or further away from an external
"reality". What I would like to quickly comment on, however, is the idea of
language as mediator in another sense. Within socio-cultural theory (to
risk broad generalizations) the idea that experience is "linguistically
mediated" emphasizes a reciprocity in structuring between "language" and
"being". That is, humans use language as a tool, but in so doing are
fundamentally oriented towards the saliency of the linguistic structures
they create. While this is true of all tools, including a hammer, it is
perhaps most true of language, as language is a near pervasive, ubiquitous
part of our existence. Thus, tools are not simply objects by which we act
on an external world, but create "us" as much as they create "things". This
may be what you're getting at when you say that language IS the static
world, but I think this co-relation (the idea of Vygotsky's "mediated
being") is important to emphasize.
Arlo
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list