[MD] The differentiating nothingness

[platootje at netscape.net]

"If you could provide a brief synopsis of your theory in similar 
fashion, it
would aid us in nailing down our differences.  Specifically, I would be
interested in seeing how your "negation of opposites" factors into the
theory."

Hello Ham,

Instead of responding to your thesis (as you ask me) I've tried to 
write down how I see it and let you react on that if you please.

So my theory goes something like:

The one thing that is true, that has no prior and no other, is Essence. 
All that differs is not Essence but may be called existence. All our 
realization and experiences are realizations and experiences of 
existence. (Existence is the sum of all experiences) If something can 
be experienced it has boundaries. Without boundaries one cannot 
experience. Boundaries may be spatial boundaries or temporal 
boundaries. A single experience will always be accompanied by one of 
those boundaries. They are created by the 'self' to limit the 
experience, so to be able to perceive it. There is no fundamental 
different between existential time and space. In existence all is still 
one. All boundaries are illusions. There is no such thing as a smallest 
particle or building-block. The one smallest unit that may exist is of 
the energy-kind. Thoughts are equal to energy so the one smallest unit 
may be a single thought.  That thought may be the most elementary 
version of "I think therefore I am". There is Essential truth is some 
of the laws of nature. E=MC2 hold an Essential truth since it states 
that everything is energy and there's no fundamental difference between 
the different things we experience. The unified field theory from 
quantum physics shows the Essential aspect of the universe. The 
wave-particle duality from quantum physics is illustrative for 
existence as a whole.
Value holds no moral judgment. A value is nothing more or nothing less 
then it is in maths. Something is either null (or unknown) or it has a 
value (or it is known).
Essence may be considered as the highest value and nothing but the 
highest value, but that's only comparative to existential values. From 
an Essential point of view Essence is value-free.
We all see matter in a very similar way. When we see matter we see an 
energy wave collapsing, forming particles, forming atoms, forming 
molecules forming matter. The only thing that we add by seeing is 
valuing. We value the matter as a body, the molecules as some 
carbon-hydrogen combination (not sure on this, I'm not a chemist), the 
atoms as Hydrogen or Carbon the particles as protons, neutron, 
electrons, quarks, etc.. This is because when we see, we use that very 
same chain as our tool, namely our eyes. To see existence in a 
completely different way one has to use completely different tools. So 
it's the tool that shapes existence. (It's a bit more complicated since 
what we really see is the reflection of something, not the object 
itself.)
In the end it results in a mental picture, a thought. So energy at 
quantum level results in energy as thought. All is still energy and all 
is still one.
This forms another confirmation that space is an illusion because when 
matter equals energy and energy has no physical measurements, nor a 
location how can matter possess these things?
Since time is an illusion also this means that everything that ever 
was, still is. It's just perceived different. The sum of quanta that 
once made up the first second after the big bang is still the sum of 
quanta today. The evolution that took place was a evolution of energy. 
But energy is still energy, and all is still one as it was back then.
This also means that we were never really separated from Essence and 
that indeed when we give up all our illusions we will see that we are, 
and we were nothing else but Essence.

In a nutshell that is.

Kind regards,
Reinier.


___________________________________________________
Try the New Netscape Mail Today!
Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List
http://mail.netscape.com