[MD] strong wind

[Heather Perella]

Hello all,

     This was taken from another thread, but I find it
pertinent as to what accounts for a strong wind.  The
female in the following storyline, would be a strong
wind against the legs of dynamic quality that could
have origins in any seemingly DQ events, but in time,
would become something too static for any continuing
independence.  Others, not just the female, would be
strong winds, too, noticeably explained as follows:

     Smith asked dmb (dmb answered this question, but
I would like to walk from this interesting question
into a comment of mine own), thus, Smith asked:  "Who
is the Pope of MOQ now?"

     I saw the movie 'V for Vendetta' this afternoon. 
One thing struck me about what a character (female) in
the movie said about the hero.  The final event
occurred and then some other people had something to
say or had their nonverbal moments of doing.  She (the
character), though, said that she would remember the
man that started this all.  The man that lead 'the
event' (I am trying to not give away the movie for
those that wish to see it, but it is obviously hard
not to give some things away about it.).  The whole
time 'this man' wore a mask.  Everybody wanted to see
this man behind the mask.  He said it is not the face
or body behind this mask that is important.  It is the
idea.  The idea was seen everywhere in bits in pieces.
 Little kids to adults, all in their own way,
influencing each other in ways they may not have
realized, but influence they did until certain actions
from these ideas popped up here and over there.  This
man was a hero, and was a major
character for this 'idea' motivating the 'events'
taking place until the climatic event.  Yet, here is
where I think something could go morally wrong.  She
wanted to remember the man.  The same man that said it
was not him, but it was the idea to contemplate and
take action with.  Yet, she literalized the idea into
one man.  That is morally wrong, because it cannot
happen.  The idea cannot be trapped in one man.  If,
social is a higher level than biological, and
intellect is higher than both, then this idea born of
intellect, spread into society, actualized in the
actions of biological beings, intellect (an idea) is
then something more than just one man, it is even more
than many humans (society), an idea goes far beyond
any biological system and social activity of many
people.  Yet, she trapped the idea in one man, even
against his understanding of where and what the idea
was.  She perverted the idea into one literal,
seemingly in her eyes maybe, separate cause of all
other events into this delineated person.  To remember
this one human and converge the idea into this one
human, and to be later, through history, become an
idea only linked with this one human being - now that
is perverted, morally wrong, and also a problem that
people in the future (using foresight) would find
themselves arguing over.  An idea is much more than
even a society of people, so how could it be
consolidated into one person. 
     This is what perverts budda, christ, and others
who lived the Way, walked listening and expressing
dharma, and tried to express something, they
themselves knew, was much more than they themselves as
individuals are.
     So who is the Pope of MOQ?  I hope us all and
more.  I hope we can look beyond any one person and
identify with something as general as quality when it
comes to understanding MOQ.  If we trap MOQ into any
one place and/or spokesperson, meanwhile, other places
and/or spokespeople exist, then we have trapped
quality or any other generalization into something
that could not possibly be morally correct.  

     The strong wind may blow the leaves into a pile,
          but we cannot forget the leaves that are
everywhere!
 

Spiritual Adirondack

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com