[MD] strong wind

[beauteak4u at aol.com]

Kudos indeed Margrett! Just saying " 'Surfing with Psyche' " feels sooo good on the tongue
as it wafts over sweetly to the mind mmmm so delicious! TY for sharing your work. Do you have hopes that it brings wonderful things to the viewer? Is it all an expression
of you heart, mind and soul ( if you believe in such things ) Q? What kind?
 
 
You asked: 

          >( And while asking this question does anyone know the meaning of LILA? )
I am not quite sure what you are asking with this question - 
the meaning of the entire book? plot analysis? 
Smith: all of that tells us something, so yes that too. More the point: What's in a name? 

M: I do think you have something about the md being a place where some
people just represent Rigel presenting arguments that cause RMP to 
kind of sulk away. On the other hand, that seems good.
S: An Escher, yes?
M: I mean,
don't you need the argument to really look at the moq? 
S: Yes. Anything else?
 
M:I'm still 
not sure I can fully embrace the moq, I have this problem in 
my head of embracing the notion that we are 'evolving' at all. 
Certainly all species change with respect to time, but as I asked 
the question before with SA in another thread, what if 
we aren't really 'evolving' at all - what if it's not important
to consider that one level trumps another one? Can't it
be more like breathing? Static to Dynamic, Static to Dynamic
back and forth like the rocking of RMP's boat? A culture
flourishes, another culture destroys it, flourishes, dies,
sometimes biological devours social, rock, paper, scissors...
who's to say that we're 'evolving' (which to me implies 
going toward some 'greater' state)? 
S: Refining the defintion then defining the refinment towards another defintion
that leads to more arguement, discussion, insult and so on...philosophy thy name is Escher!
As Falls Wichita  so falls Wichita  Falls....

M:I guess I just sense an odd paradox lurking in the book somehow. 
S: Ya Think? <G>

M:Sometimes when I'm reading the md, I wonder how much of these
conversations come out in your personal daily interactions. 
How does quality affect your every day intimate relationships with 
your loved ones.
S: No one talks like that here.It's Nano Nano or No_Thing at all! OL

M:In Lila, it seems that RMP was pretty 'remote' and disconnected 
from the people in his environment (Rigel and Lila namely) and 
they sensed that - I don't think he ever got out of himself enough to try to
see things from other people's points of view. Lila on the other
hand wanted to be so engaged with people that she wanted
to connect with an inanimate object to replace the
need for that connection that she lost. 

At least one thing I think I gather from this discussion
group is that it seems like people are actually 
trying to be 'engaged' dynamically with each other, even
if we're not quite sure what the goal is, which leads us
to another question - do we need to have a goal? 
Can the discussions themselves be the goal?
S: You mean "here" inside a Twilght Zone room at the sign post up ahead? Just asking!

Dinner time.
Smith