[MD] Religious experience & thinking in an MOQ context
David M
davidint at blueyonder.co.uk
Wed Mar 29 12:34:14 PST 2006
Hi folks
For me there is plenty of scope for religious thinking and experience in the
MOQ.
In fact I think we can improve the quality of both in such a context.
Like science, I think fundamentalism makes the mistake of being obsessed
with SQ
and even worse, fundamentalism fears DQ and its constant change and
development.
Of course, science does much to master SQ (the order of things), its
limitation is
that it can act as a block to recognising DQ (the disorder and creativity
that allows
for change and development).
In the past life was much harder, grasping the very limited amount of order
and control
available to human beings was crucial. Understanding and social order
required a keen
grasp of SQ and even an attempt to increase the amount and levels of SQ to
protect
human beings against the power and disruption of DQ.
In the beginning came a new word and a new authority to bring a new order.
This came
with a whole ideology of gods and morals and laws to justify and explain the
new order.
In this sense DQ comes first and last. SQ is used to limit the DQ, so that
something can
be built, a foundation laid, a level created. But then DQ returns on a new
level, bubbling
forth a new level of SQ, with a new levelof creative power and complexity.
After the religions of SQ, order, control, authority it is possible for new
religious thought and
experience to emerge. New religious thinking, like new science, is starting
to open its eyes
to DQ. Experience is not full of order, there is very little order in
experience and the world.
We are much more aware that we are not protected by some divine force today,
we face
all kinds of personal, social, political, global, cosmic risks. But equally
we have vastly more
possibilities than earlier ages. Modern religious thinking is about the
contemplation of
experience and a reality that is vastly free, contingent, open and risky.
Modern religious
thought is about our human relationship to the dominant dynamic quality of
experience and
existence. It a a vast sea change from the old religious thinking about what
is permanent
and beyond the reality of experience in some rather dull transcendental
realm.
Over to you.........
Regards
David M
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list