[MD] Static latching & faith

[david buchanan]

DM said:
...I think the whole point about recognising DQ in experience is that the 
doors of perception can be opened, that the mystical can be recognised in 
ordinary experience, that experience has first rights over the reductions of 
experience that enable science to get on with its business. Let's not ignore 
the transcendental or forget that the reality of the transcendental is 
entirely apparent in experience, if you can see the movement of DQ which 
declares the existence of borders and border crossings.

dmb replied:
You sorta lost me somewhere near the border crossing, but otherwise I agree 
emphatically...

DM answered:
Borders? Well we simply experience very little at any given moment, the SQ 
comes and goes, such are the borders surrounding our experience, yet we 
postulate a whole cosmos and experience its vast possibilities.

dmb says:
Sorry, but I have no idea what you're trying to say. We experience very 
little? SQ comes and goes? Its not that I agree or disagee. I'm just saying 
that this seems quite meaningless. Its a series of vaguely poetic phrases 
strung together in a sentence that is grammatically incorrect and which 
expresses no coherent idea that I can detect. And it don't rhyme neither.

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/