[MD] Intellectual activity
aesuszynski
aesuszynski at npgcable.com
Sun May 14 11:56:32 PDT 2006
Alice to Ham
I just read "Dealing with Antagonists" on the Essentialist Forum. Did you
write it? I really like the site and the ideas. The only problem is that the
background obscures the foreground which makes some of the text illegible,
at least on my monitor.
"The Essentialist believes in the sanctity of the individual. We respect
the dignity and freedom of our fellow man and expect the same in return."
I like that and your post certainly maintains that standard in that you show
great respect.
"Another way to sidestep the problem is Colin McGinn's, who espouses
> 'mysterianism'. This says that there is a rational/physical explanation
> but
> we're not allowed to work it out because of our 'epistemic limits'"
I have just finished "The Illusion of Conscious Will" by Daniel Wegner. In
it he says that the feeling of consciousness is created by the mind and the
brain. Of course the first question would be "what is the mind?". We know
what the brain is certainly.
He says:
"The experience of conscious will arises when a person infers an apparent
causal path from thought to action. The actual causal paths are not present
in the person's consciuosness. The thought is caused by unconscious mental
events and the action is caused by unconscious mental events and these
unconscious mental events may also be linked to each other directly or
through yet another mental or brain process. The will is experienced as a
result of what is apparent, not what is real."
So this would seem to support McGinn's idea of epistemic limits. We just
aren't equipped to know some things. But I doubt that will keep us from
trying. And that is a good thing.
Alice
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list