[MD] Intellectual activity

[a steffes]

I believe that moq implies that all objects are inherently dynamic, regardless of moq-hierarchical orientation. Think of moq as a prism that accepts dynamic input (any object) and outputs discrete bands, as it were, which may be labeled according to moq (bio, socio, etc.) The problem as far as I can tell is that objects don't come pre-defined (they are dynamic after all) and any resultant values are largely subjective. In other words, resultant of what? The process of unfolding reality? Of individual perception? Of the moq, the whole moq, and nothing but the moq? I can't say.
   
  In any case, objects don't belong to static categories. Objects are dynamic.
   
  ayar
   
  
Gene M <boredandunstable at gmail.com> wrote:
  Craig wrote:
>
> SA, Gene, et al.,
> > Money is the means, the Quality the End.
>
> I agree. Maybe, we should think of money in terms of the level of its
> end: biological (money spent on subsistence); social (on taxes, etc.);
> intellectual (on satisfying creative, intellectual, recreational, etc.
> values).
> Craig
>
>
I'm not sure if I understand, should we consider money to belong to several
levels, depending on what it is used for? As you state, those are only the
levels that it's use ends in. The object itself seems to reside solely in
the Social level to me. Could you explain what you mean a bit more?

-Gene
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


		
---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.