[MD] The MOQ and Righteousness

[craigerb at comcast.net]

David,
Does it matter what "ultimately" exists?  We thinking beings have to deal with everything that exists.
Craig

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: David Harding <davidharding at optusnet.com.au> 

> Hi SA and all, 
> 
> I'm not really sure of your understanding of the MOQ and Buddhism but in 
> your opinion, would you say the MOQ is simply realistic Zen? That is; 
> Zen which acknowledges the quality the suffering produces. Or is it 
> realistic Zen with righteousness as a result of the first statement. 
> That is; Zen which acknowledges the quality the suffering produces and 
> thus basks in this quality. 
> 
> Personally I think that ultimately there is no righteousness, quality, 
> basking of glory, or even glory. There is no Zen, MOQ or Buddhism. But 
> we're alive and we can't go around without defining, affecting or 
> statically doing something. So the results of what we do are this. 
> 
> Cheers, 
> 
> David. 
> 
> moq_discuss mailing list 
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. 
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org 
> Archives: 
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ 
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/