[MD] Neoconservatism

[Gene M]

>
> This is how your use of "most open of all" comes
> off the screen to me and I notice freedom is necessary
> for quality intellectual values.  This "most open of
> all" hints to a collective order, also, that is
> sharing freely individual thoughts.  Anybody have a
> way to get me out of this collective versus individual
> or order versus freedom argumentation?  Sure, quality
> is the answer, which only would mean to me that I
> would have to sit on this question for a while to see
> what happens, but if anybody else has a suggestion I
> would appreciate some input.
>

It often seems to me that Everything is right. And explaining it just causes
problems. But such is our lot, and we continue to try and pin things down.
All dichotomies are artificial. Me and Them. It's all the same thing in the
beginning and end. We all come up with our own individual ideas, and then we
share them with everyone else's individual ideas, and mash em up, and
eventually we come up with a common idea and call it True and go on our ways
content. Or so it seems to me sometimes.

-Gene