[MD] Distinguishing Levels
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Tue May 30 09:27:31 PDT 2006
[Steve]
I like that quote too, but I don't see how you could take it to mean that
we can no longer talk about whether something is true or false. You can
still have truth even after you leave "Truth" behind.
[Arlo]
Although we must accept that we are governed by analogies, that does not
mean they can't be useful, powerful and formational aspects of our thought.
The key is to never confuse what is "provisionally true" with some Absolute
Hegelian Truth (as Pirsig calls it).
Thus we can say that "2 + 2 = 4" is a "true statement", but only
provisionally (and including the context of a particular mathematical system).
[Steve]
Truth is that which is good to believe. My point is that we don't believe
or disbelieve social patterns, we only do that with intellectual patterns.
[Arlo]
Let me take a tangent and say, I think that social patterns described *are*
intellectual patterns. "Family" is an intellectual pattern used to describe
particular social habits, but it is not the social habits it attempts to
represent. This is true too of biological and inorganic patterns. "H20" is
not the inorganic pattern it attempts to symbolically represent. And as an
intellectual pattern it is only ever "provisionally true". Science,
someday, may in fact tell us that this inorganic pattern is NOT composed of
two hydrogen and one oxygen atoms, but composed on 2.5 newly discovered
G-Waves and half of a P-resonance curve, just as past science told us that
water is a indivisible, foundational entity.
In this sense, we can believe or disbelieve social patterns the same way we
believe or disbelieve the intellectual-symbolic patterns used to describe
inorganic and biological patterns.
Believing or disbelieving, I'd go so far as to say, ARE intellectual level
activities. But since our understanding of "it" is always symbolically
mediated (except in the pre-intellectual, aesthetic), the moment we think
about inorganic, biological or social patterns we are in the realm of
intellectual level activity, and we can in fact believe or disbelieve how
we've codeified these patterns we experience.
Arlo
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list