[MD] Distinguishing Levels (Platt's Individual level)
MarshaV
marshalz at charter.net
Wed May 31 15:20:03 PDT 2006
At 06:05 PM 5/31/2006, Platt wrote:
> Hi Marsha,
>Thanks for the quote. My problem with it is their definition of beauty
>being an appeal to our preference for simplicity and/or symmetry is too
>limited. For me, beauty means in the presence of something good. That
>would include a theory that lacks simplicity and symmetry, but is
>"successful." And for me something good is either points to or is the
>result of DQ, or both, simultaneously.
>
>Platt
>
Then it remains something for me to think about. Thanks for
clarifying your definition of beauty.
Marsha
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list