[MD] Distinguishing Levels (Platt's Individual level)

MarshaV marshalz at charter.net
Wed May 31 15:20:03 PDT 2006


At 06:05 PM 5/31/2006, Platt wrote:
>   Hi Marsha,
>Thanks for the quote. My problem with it is their definition of beauty
>being an appeal to our preference for simplicity and/or symmetry is too
>limited. For me, beauty means in the presence of something good. That
>would include a theory that lacks simplicity and symmetry, but is
>"successful." And for me something good is either points to or is the
>result of DQ, or both, simultaneously.
>
>Platt
>

Then it remains something for me to think about.  Thanks for 
clarifying your definition of beauty.

Marsha 




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list