[MD] psst, Squonk, Over here

[Squonkonguitar at aol.com]

At 05:30 PM 10/31/2006, Mark wrote:

>Mark 31-10-06:
>How  can patterns, which are supposed to be static, be Dynamic also?
>The  language is confusing don't you think?

Mark,

I'm not persuaded  that change can be defined any more than DQ.  But 
don't worry about the  confusion, it may be that confusion is the 
mother of  insight.

Marsha

Mark 1-11-06: Hello Marsha.
Maybe the answer is simply that nothing is static anyway?
 
In a stream or flux everything changes, even individual atoms. In fact,  
there may not be individual atoms?
The term, 'stable' patterns has been suggested as a replacement for,  
'static'.
What do you think?
 
Love,
Mark