[MD] psst, Squonk, Over here

[David M]

Hi Marsha/Mark

I quite like just pattern or regularity myself,
but we also mean something that repeats, that
is the same again. Every experience is just an
event unless it repeats in some way to form a pattern.

Seeya
David M


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "MarshaV" <marshalz at charter.net>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] psst, Squonk, Over here


> At 08:11 AM 11/1/2006, you wrote:
>>At 05:30 PM 10/31/2006, Mark wrote:
>>
>> >Mark 31-10-06:
>> >How  can patterns, which are supposed to be static, be Dynamic also?
>> >The  language is confusing don't you think?
>>
>>Mark,
>>
>>I'm not persuaded  that change can be defined any more than DQ.  But
>>don't worry about the  confusion, it may be that confusion is the
>>mother of  insight.
>>
>>Marsha
>>
>>Mark 1-11-06: Hello Marsha.
>>Maybe the answer is simply that nothing is static anyway?
>>
>>In a stream or flux everything changes, even individual atoms. In fact,
>>there may not be individual atoms?
>>The term, 'stable' patterns has been suggested as a replacement for,
>>'static'.
>>What do you think?
>>
>>Love,
>>Mark
> 
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> Language is tricky, but I've never thought of 'static' as meaning: 
> without movement.  I've more thought of 'static' as meaning: having 
> limited movement (more or less).  I think the word 'stable' has a 
> connotation that is too positive, so I don't much like it as a 
> replacement.  But maybe the confusion is JUST in the language.  For 
> instance, within science a word might have a more precise meaning 
> than it does for a layperson.
> 
> Marsha
> 
> 
> 
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>