[MD] psst, Squonk, Over here

[MarshaV]

At 05:04 PM 11/1/2006, you wrote:
>Hi Mark,
>
>Language is tricky, but I've never thought of 'static' as  meaning:
>without movement.  I've more thought of 'static' as meaning:  having
>limited movement (more or less).  I think the word 'stable' has  a
>connotation that is too positive, so I don't much like it as a
>replacement.  But maybe the confusion is JUST in the language.   For
>instance, within science a word might have a more precise meaning
>than it does for a layperson.
>
>Marsha
>
>Mark 1-11-06: Hi Marsha,
>Fair enough. I will think about it.
>Love,
>Mark


Mark,

I'd like to see the discussion get back to the points that Case and 
Gene were making about the Tao and Buddhism.  They were getting at 
something worth exploring.  Not the definition, but the experience.

Marsha