[MD] Doug Renselle, where art thou? I need you.

[Heather Perella]

     [Ron]
> like light, why can't DQ and SQ be two
> parts of the same
> phenomanon? A particle and a wave?


     This is exactly how I see dq and sq, that's why
they are quality.  dq and sq are parts of the same
phenomenon, as light is a particle and a wave.  This
is why I believe the yin in the traditional approach
as a circle of yang within its' half, and yang has a
circle of yin within its' half of the yin and yang
picture.  Yin slips into yang and yang slips into yin.
 Nothing is totally black and white, as the phrase
goes.  This is why I believe Pirsig insisted on
morality in the MoQ.  This is why society has laws,
but intellect can discern society, supervise society. 
This is also why dq can open static patterns to the
must larger perspective that exists, so largely, that
static patterns have yet to fully define this very
large primary reality.  So, the non-clear-cut black
and white, and everything can become gray issue, is
discerned into static patterns of laws and
intellectual discernment of morality as yin and yang
slip one into the other (dq slips into sq, one into
the other - the single phenomenon called quality). 
Maybe quality is recluse.  We know quality is here,
but it does not come fully out to play.

Thanks,
SA 


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Access over 1 million songs - Yahoo! Music Unlimited 
(http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited)