[MD] Capitalism: A Question of Morality

[Case]

Dan,

Where I come from this happens daily. But even from what you said the guy is
only holding on to the land for a few more years until it escalates further
in value. I don't imagine he is holding on to it so he can sell it to the
Nature Conservancy. Since it is being farmed it is not like it is a bird
sanctuary now. So if the moral issue is shafting the family friend my guess
is the guy can see the writing on the wall and should be looking for
somewhere else anyway. But the other moral issue is providing for Roy's
family and planning for a comfortable retirement.

I say Live Long and Prosper.

Case

-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of Dan Glover
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 11:39 PM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: [MD] Capitalism: A Question of Morality

Hello everyone

Quite some time ago, a man bought a farm. Let's call him "Roy". At the time,

the farm was on a gravel road in the middle of nowhere and he paid very 
little for the property. Now though, the farm is bordered by busy highways 
and new housing developments and the land is worth (at a minimum) a hundred 
times what Roy paid. In a few years time the land will (quite possibly) be 
worth a thousand times what he paid. So even though he would make out like a

bandit, Roy feels now is not the time to sell.

Roy is retired from farming and he rents the land out to a younger man, a 
longtime friend of the family, who plants corn and soybeans. However, the 10

year land lease is up for renewal and Roy has been approached by a man from 
the tree nursery down the road who wants to lease the land for nursery 
operations. If this happens, the land can never be put back to crop 
production again. The soil will be ruined.

The nursery is offering Roy 3 times the rent money that he has been getting 
from the crop farmer who currently leases the land. Since farming isn't a 
rich man's game, the crop farmer cannot match the nursery dollar for dollar.

Being on a fixed income, Roy could use the added income. And every year the 
property taxes go up. This makes the nursery offer very hard to turn down.

Still, if Roy leases the land to the nursery, he is basically committing the

property to new housing developments at the end of the 10 year lease as that

will be the natural progression of things (since the land will be useless as

farm land). Once the area is built out, the tree nursery will no longer be 
needed and houses and streets will gobble up the former farm.

What is the right thing for the land? What about the farmer who now leases 
the land for crop production - isn't he entitled to some small measure of 
loyalty?

How would you advise Roy? What would the MOQ say about this?


moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/