[MD] Fw: No more SOM and no more money!

[ARLO J BENSINGER JR]

[Arlo had said]
What physical damage to your body or property do bikini tops and veils (or  lack
thereof) inflict? Using this reasoning, justify a law that forces  women to
wear tops when at a beach (for one example).

[Platt]
Until Arlo posts his nude body on the internet for all to see, we can consider
his plea for freedom to expose oneself to be hypocritical nonsense. (Methinks
he has a boobs fixation.)

[Arlo]
Typical dodge. Expected.

The only hypocrisy is your plea for "free choice", which suddenly becomes silent
when people choose to be different than you. So, what physical damage to your
body or property do bikini tops and veils (or lack thereof) inflict? Or do we
consider this latest decree to be more empty rhetoric?

[Platt]
As for the proposed law to ban an Islamic religious law requiring women who are
subjugated to wear veils I am all for it. 

[Arlo]
Go from forcing them TO wear it to forcing them NOT to wear it, yeah, typical.
So much for "choice".

[Platt]
Purely religious edicts are always suspect to the intellectual level.

[Arlo]
Forcing them TO wear a veil = religious edict.
Forcing them NOT TO wear a veil = intellectual level.

No wonder Platt continues to dodge and evade questions. With reasoning like
this, I would too.