[MD] moral judgements

[MarshaV]

At 09:22 PM 11/23/2006, SA wrote:
>Comments at the bottom Marsha and Platt:
>
>
>
>      As values and morals are the elements of this
>universe according to the MoQ and dynamic quality
>lurks, therefore. if all was defined, then all would
>be static.  This leaves the universe having a
>mysterious notion that can be defined, no doubt, but
>always another mystery is lurking at the horizon.
>Dynamic quality is thus quiet, and static quality is
>ever refining and redefining as dq latches, in time,
>and to use what Thomas Kuhn once said, the paradigm
>shifts, or to use MoQ terminology, static quality
>changes with each dq codified via art - simply the
>universe is creative.  We'll make moral decisions
>based on the new code of art latching into static
>quality, thus, with the changing events we will make
>decisions, but how moral those decisions are?  That
>plays out in the field.  A?
>
>
>quiet,
>SA

Hi SA,

You've removed me from sin, but placed me among moral judgements.  I 
think I'll just squint for a while and see what appears.

squirming,
Marsha