[MD] Essentialism and the MOQ

[LARAMIE LOEWEN]

Hi SA,

I wasn't the one proposing an amoral universe.  IMO the universe
is pro-life.

Cheers,
Laramie
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Heather Perella<mailto:spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com> 
  To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org<mailto:moq_discuss at moqtalk.org> 
  Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 9:36 AM
  Subject: Re: [MD] Essentialism and the MOQ



       [Laramie]
  > How could man discover good and bad in an amoral
  > universe?

       So why be moral?  What's at stake?  Nothing it
  seems to you.  You can do whatever you want and nobody
  would care.  Oh, but I'll add somebody will, another
  person would, and how about caring for the earth?  Are
  we to make moral decisions based on it doesn't matter,
  due to the universe is amoral?  People are in the
  universe.  How we may live, in a chemical ridden creek
  or no poison in the creek.  Creek, people, and much
  else is of this universe, not really seein' what
  amoral means.

  woods,
  SA





   
  ____________________________________________________________________________________
  Do you Yahoo!?
  Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
  http://new.mail.yahoo.com<http://new.mail.yahoo.com/>
  moq_discuss mailing list
  Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
  http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org<http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org>
  Archives:
  http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/<http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/>
  http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/<http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/>