[MD] Debate on Science_ReligionToday

ian glendinning psybertron at gmail.com
Mon Nov 27 09:43:23 PST 2006


Hi Khaled,
I like your thinking ...
If I could join two of your points together ...

>
> Objective thinking is not in vogue anymore.
> .... and ...
> A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
>

I think people believe in objective thinking (based on dangerously
little knowledge), but their actions are not as objective as they
think. (This thought / action dilemma I keep mentioning.)

Something needs redefining here, whether its objectivism or knowledge,
but we easily get into word-games as you say. I just say MoQ for
short.

One inescapable fact for me is that progress needs to recognise the
layering of knowledge, and accept some sort of "intellectual elitism",
subject to pragmatic / democratic checks and balances naturally.
Without it any argument (in words) can appear as good as any other,
and incredibly bad decisions get made and justified.

Ian



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list