[MD] Essentialism and the MOQ

[MarshaV]

At 03:25 PM 11/27/2006, Joe wrote:

>On Monday 27 November 2006 9:03 AM Marsha writes:
>
>Couldn't morality be a sort of binding agent for static quality?
>
>Hi Marsha and all,
>
>IMO time is a binding agent for static quality. Time and morality are
>relatives of static quality in existence. Dimensions in existence leave DQ
>undefined.

Hi Joe,

I find morality as a binding agent works well with the Buddhist idea 
of suffering.  I think.  If something is 'good' one wants to attach 
to it, if something is 'bad' one wants to avoid it.  Isn't that what 
Buddhism states is the cause of suffering.   If you're living in the 
moment, you're not attaching or avoiding, just chopping wood, 
carrying water or painting.

Marsha





  Marsha