[MD] Essentialism and the MOQ

[Ham Priday]

Hi Marsha --



> This was a very thoughtful article.  By the arguments
> presented in this article, I might call myself a moral relativist.
>
> It also fits with my present thinking that morality is a binding
> agent of static quality.

Glad you liked the sermon.

I view the "self" (proprietary sense of value) as the free agent of its
uncreated Source.  Could you explain in your own terms the meaning of
"morality is a binding agent of static quality"?  And could you possibly
explain it with minimal reference to patterns and levels?

Thanks, Marsha.  I'd really like to understand this concept.

Best regards,
Ham