[MD] Essentialism and the MOQ

[Heather Perella]

     [Marsha]
> I think that Zen does not say 'ignore sq', but 'do
> not attach to sq'.


     A discontinuity exists between dq and sq.  Dq
will never attach to sq.  Yet, once dq does, then
static latching occurs.  The dq no longer is dq, in
this sense.  Dq is now sq.  Therefore, I see how dq
never attaches to sq.  Only sq can attach to sq.  Dq
changes sq, but the discontinuity between dq and sq is
quiet, is nothingness, and therefore to make a leap
between dq and sq is to have to keep the discourse
clarified as to whether we are talking dq or talking
sq.  Dq changes sq, refreshes it, so to speak, but any
changes, creativity, art codification, 'refreshing' is
now on the Way of static quality, even though, dq was
involved.  There is that discontinuity.  I can't talk
dq when I truly am talking dq.  
     I really feel I don't know either, Marsha.  I do
know Zen is intellectual.  The quietness can be
spoken.  Emptiness can be felt.  Nothingness can be
touched.  This tiny skull is trying, but I go nowhere.



woods,
SA


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com