[MD] are theism and mysticism mutually exclusive notions?

[Case]

 [SA]
Case I understand you like static patterns.  You
like science dearly.  I like science, too, yet I'm not
'into' science as much as you might be.  So, please
help me understand what your noticing here from your
static inclination.  Why are you saying that the
biggest obstacle is the idea that DQ is good?  Why so?

[Case]
Because I take Dynamic quality to be dynamic in Quality. 
It is the active force. 
It is sunlight and a cool breeze
But it can turn to
Lightning and tornados.

Perhaps Mother Goose has best described my idea of DQ:

There was a little girl
Who had a little curl
Right in the middle of her forehead
When she was good
She was very, very good
But when she was bad
She was horrid.

[SA]
 Is it due to how much uncertainty has been in
physics, and unlike the examples you gave of
Newton-determinism and Einstein-moral relativism, are
you saying uncertainty has no static counterpart like
determinism and moral relativism.  If so, from this
line of thinking, are you stating since there is no
static counterpart that resembles these examples, then
we find too much dynamic quality in a society that has
unleashed and found uncertainty into the culture, even
the scientific culture.  I'm having difficulty
understanding your statement, so, please forgive me if
my shoot in the dark to understand you has gone
astray.  

[Case]
The opposite of change is stasis. When things don't change much we call them
stable or more predictable. New or higher forms of relationship can not
occur until the lower levels have settled down. Nothing wrong with stability
evolution depends on it. Without stabile inorganic behavior their can be no
biology. Biology demands a Goldilocks zone.

But nothing resists change completely, all things must pass.