[MD] are theism and mysticism mutually exclusive notions?

[Case]

gosh gav,

you got me to convert to lower case. i am working toward bile but you are
making me laugh too hard. it must help to turn away from ideas that have
consequences to those that don't. i used to think that myths were fictions
that pointed to truths. but looking for truths that point to fictions seem
so much more creative. it's hardly any effort at all and best of all there's
no final! 

yeah dawkins proclaiming his blind watchermaker, sheesh. he is so icky. and
untenable to the moq, too. looks like somebody's watchmaker needs new
glasses. if we could just get dawkins to the moq optical department we could
make him a spectacle, to make him less skeptical. 

genes are like two levels below snake bellies and dawkins is ten levels
under that. ridiculous indeed! double ridiculous! jeans? now those, i'd like
to get into. that's experience!

reductive dawkinsesque hypocritical misanthropic nihilistic wankers, whew...
how was that? am I catching on? 
It tastes kinda like tourette's...  

gav, am i going to need a tin foil hat to get the full effect?

smoochies,

Lower case



-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of gav
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 10:10 PM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] are theism and mysticism mutually exclusive notions?

glad to have helped!

but you still don't seem to get it case.

its not about genes, hormones, or any ideas,
ultimately. they are *ideas*: ********creations*****
of intellect, which in turn is based on the mythos....

you see i spent many years studying biology at uni
being taught to think like dawkins and then many years
evolving past that misanthropic nihilism, and then i
spent the first half of this year dealing with the
same reductive hypocrisy in philosophy of life
science. anything that takes the 'livingness' out of
life: THE EXPERIENCE OF EXISTENCE....well i will bark
out everytime cos those folk are being hypocritical
wankers. they, like everyone, live their life
according to value and then proclaim a blind
watchmaker scenario. forgive my bile...no i don't care
if you forgive it or not (but if you are a christian i
guess you have to ;-)).

maybe you don't see the damage of such stuff.....

and don't disparage my interest or valuation of the
biological level thanks. not what i was getting at at
all. what i was getting at was that the biological
level is ONE level, subordinate to the social and
intellectual levels, and of course DQ - immediate
experience itself. a dawkinesque, everything ends with
the genes picture, is ridiculously naive and untenable
from an MOQ perspective. if this is not clear than we
are not gonna get very far.........




	

	
		
____________________________________________________ 
On Yahoo!7 
Messenger: Plug-in the fun with handy plug-ins 
http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/